Watch Court TV live with Fubo for $0 Today
See the trials that captivated the world and made history! Join your favorite Court TV hosts, Vinnie Politan, Julie Grant, Michael Ayala, Ted Rowlands and Ashley Willcott, and witness all the dramatic moments streaming on Court TV Legendary Trials.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP67 "Taped Confession As Key Evidence"Dr. Oziel's testimony was critical for the State's case; he had evidence of a plot to kill Jose and Kitty Menendez along the emotion and mindset of the Menendez brothers who admitted doing it.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP68 "Therapist Seeks Self-Protections"The therapist who recorded the Menendez brothers' confession, said he feared for his life.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP69 "More Questions For The Psychotherapist"The Defense teams for both defendents had more questions for the psychotherapist on the stand.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP70 "Notes of a Confession"From the very beginning the Defense teams of both defendants fought to get the confession tapes thrown out.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP56 "Detailed Video Analysis Delivered to Jurors"Cross-examination begins on the defense's use-of-force expert and certified video analyst; Dr. John Black presents slowed-down video of the deadly shootings, frame by frame, with detailed analysis.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP57 "Social Commentator Chimes In"Social commentator and videographer Frank Hernandez, the defense's witness, testifies that he regularly shows up to civil unrest in other cities throughout the U.S. with the aim of documenting rioters and looters.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP58 "Videographer Bias Towards the Defendant"Social commentator and videographer Frank Hernandez continues on the stand in cross-examination; the prosecution questions Hernandez's bias favoring the defendant Kyle Rittenhouse.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP59 "Issue With Enlarging Video"Both sides in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse debate on software programs and methods used in enlarging video content; the state's forensic imagining specialist is recalled back on the stand to clear things up for the jury.
Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial
S1, EP171 "Challenging Richard Green"Jurors listened to more expert testimony from the Defense's forensics examiner. Richard Green put a different light on the data retrieved from the phones of Karen Read and John O'Keefe. He later testified under cross-examination. Two of the State's experts who worked with the phones of John O'Keefe and the defendant disagreed with Richard Green's work in this case.
Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial
S1, EP172 "Where's The Bruising?"Karen Read's defense called in the services of a retired medical doctor for the second time in her murder trial. This time jurors listened to the expert testimony of a forensic pathologist. He gave a different take on how John O'Keefe died. Dr. Frank Sheridan went straight to the point about the injuries he saw on the victim. To him, it didn't look remotely at all like O'Keefe had been hit by a car. Why? His body lacked any significant bruising.
Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial
S1, EP173 "No Evidence To A Hit-And-Run"According to the Defense's forensic pathologist, there's no evidence of John O'Keefe being fatally hit by a car. This was contrary to the State's argument on how he lost his life. The cross-examination was not over yet on Dr. Frank Sheridan. He told jurors that he had not done any autopsies on people hit by the back of a vehicle. For jurors, Karen Read's defense brought in experts in the same field as the State's experts. The goal was to challenge their testimony.
Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial
S1, EP174 "An Accident Reconstructionist"Jurors were brought back in the topic of accident reconstruction. Karen Read's defense wanted to challenge the State's assertion that she reversed her car at over 20 miles an hour to hit her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, and then drove away leaving him to die in a snowbank. Dr. Daniel Wolfe tried to make clear to the jury that he was not hired by her lawyers. Instead, he and his team independently examined the photographic evidence of the crime scene.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP41 "Defense Begins Their Case-in-Chief"Nicholas Smith is the first witness for the defense; like the defendant that night in Kenosha, Wis., Smith was armed and patrolling a local car dealership from rioters and looters during the violent demonstrations.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP42 "Armed Patrollers Testify on the Stand"The defense continues their case-in-chief by calling the second witness in a row who was part of the armed group the defendant was with in Kenosha, Wis., that fateful night; Joann Fiedler testifies on what prompted her to join the armed group.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP43 "Witness Speaks on Chaos in Kenosha"Cross-examination continues on Joann Fiedler, an armed woman who accompanied the defendant while they were among a security group patrolling in Kenosha, Wis., before the deadly shootings.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP44 "Freelance Photographer Captured the Violent Moments"Jurors hear from a freelance photographer who was also in Kenosha, Wis.; Nathan DeBruin took photos and recorded video during the violent demonstrations.