Watch Court TV Legendary Trials live with Fubo for $0 Today
See the trials that captivated the world and made history! Join your favorite Court TV hosts, Vinnie Politan, Julie Grant, Michael Ayala, Ted Rowlands and Ashley Willcott, and witness all the dramatic moments streaming on Court TV Legendary Trials.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP10 "All About the Blood"The state argues that the evidence left behind proves O.J. Simpson's guilt in the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, and says that bloody footprints leave an important trail.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP11 "Defense Gives Their Opening Statements"Lead attorney Johnnie Cochran begins, with the focus on why O.J. Simpson was not responsible for the stabbing deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP12 "Two Different OJ Simpsons"The defense paints a different picture of O.J. Simpson than what the state tells jurors; prosecutors say he was abusive, and his rage led to the murders; the defense claims that he was a benevolent man who helped his wife, her family and friends.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP13 "Bad Police Work"The defense claims the police did not immediately call the coroner's office after the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman are discovered; instead, they were called 10 hours after investigators showed up, a violation of police procedure.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP77 "A Therapist's Dilemma"The State's key witness had some baggage by the time Erik Menendez confessed to him that he and his brother killed his parents; the defense wanted Dr. Jerome Oziel to be seen as sketchy in the eyes of the jurors.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP61 "Reckless Homicide or Self-Defense?"Rittenhouse claims he acted in self-defense when he shot three people during a protest in Kenosha, Wis., in 2020; the judge, defense and prosecution continue to argue over the charge of reckless homicide and what the jury will be allowed to consider.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP62 "The Reckless Murder Charge"Both sides in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse go back and forth over the issue of what provoked the shootings that left two men dead and one injured; Rittenhouse says this was self-defense, but the prosecution argues he was reckless.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP63 "Drone Footage"The prosecution shows drone footage to the court in its argument over provocation instructions to the jury; the judge listenes to arguments about what the jury will be allowed to consider when they get the case in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP65 "Full Confession Tape Recorded"The cross-examination of Erik Menendez's therapist was a lengthy one.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP67 "Taped Confession As Key Evidence"Dr. Oziel's testimony was critical for the State's case; he had evidence of a plot to kill Jose and Kitty Menendez along the emotion and mindset of the Menendez brothers who admitted doing it.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP68 "Therapist Seeks Self-Protections"The therapist who recorded the Menendez brothers' confession, said he feared for his life.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP69 "More Questions For The Psychotherapist"The Defense teams for both defendents had more questions for the psychotherapist on the stand.
CA vs Menendez
S1, EP70 "Notes of a Confession"From the very beginning the Defense teams of both defendants fought to get the confession tapes thrown out.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP56 "Detailed Video Analysis Delivered to Jurors"Cross-examination begins on the defense's use-of-force expert and certified video analyst; Dr. John Black presents slowed-down video of the deadly shootings, frame by frame, with detailed analysis.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP57 "Social Commentator Chimes In"Social commentator and videographer Frank Hernandez, the defense's witness, testifies that he regularly shows up to civil unrest in other cities throughout the U.S. with the aim of documenting rioters and looters.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP58 "Videographer Bias Towards the Defendant"Social commentator and videographer Frank Hernandez continues on the stand in cross-examination; the prosecution questions Hernandez's bias favoring the defendant Kyle Rittenhouse.