Watch Hot Bench with Fubo for $0 Today
Many popular court shows are on TV. How can the genre improve? How about using a three-judge panel? That's the concept of "Hot Bench," created by Judge Judy Sheindlin. After hearing each case, the judges discuss it among themselves before rendering a verdict. The show's title comes from a term describing a court action in which a judge frequently interrupts lawyers with questions.
S10, EP142 "Lash Clash"
When her client's lash extensions fall out, an eyelash technician is willing to re-do them free of charge, but the client makes excuses and demands a refund; the technician says the damage was self-inflicted.
S11, EP174 "Financial Knock-Out"
A boxing manager sues his former protégé over an unpaid loan; the fighter blames his lack of repayment on "shady" interest rates and his manager's wealth.
S12, EP167 "Transmission Impossible"
A woman says a repair shop turned her SUV into a long-term guest and never fully fixed it; the mechanic says extensive testing was needed to diagnose the problem. Buckle up as the judges take this automotive showdown for a spin!
S12, EP72 "The Lost Footage"
A documentary deal fades to black: a man says he paid for a polished film but got only a one-minute teaser and excuses; the filmmaker says he delivered the goods, but the client missed the download window!
S12, EP167 "Transmission Impossible"
A woman says a repair shop turned her SUV into a long-term guest and never fully fixed it; the mechanic says extensive testing was needed to diagnose the problem. Buckle up as the judges take this automotive showdown for a spin!
S12, EP166 "There Will Be Mud"
A pile of dirt turns neighborly relations into a muddy mess! One says runoff damaged his property; the other argues that the dirt was there all along, and he improved the area, not damaged it. This dirt-filled disagreement leaves the judges shoveling through accusations in search of the truth.
S12, EP165 "Left My Brother A-Loan"
A business venture has two brothers at odds over a beverage trailer; one says he lent money to purchase it, while the other argues that it was always an investment. Now the judges must decide whose story holds water.
