Watch CA v. O.J. Simpson with Fubo
Additional taxes, fees, and regional restrictions may apply.
TVPGHD
CA v. O.J. SimpsonS1 "Something Is Wrong Here"First, the defense's forensic scientist, Dr. Henry Lee says it; then both of O.J. Simpson's attorneys repeat it during closing arguments, which is - "Something is wrong"- when it comes to the State's evidence against O.J.
S1 "Johnnie Cochran Returns to the Podium"O.J. Simpson's lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran, returns to address the jury in closing arguments; he claims that it was not personal between his team and the prosecution.
S1 "Defense Wraps up Its Final Remarks"Defense wraps up their final remarks to the jury, pleading for them to acquit their client; lead attorney Johnnie Cochran tells the jury that with so much reasonable doubt, O.J. is entitled to an acquittal.
S1 "Appealing To The Jury"Prosecutors began their final appeal to the jury in this case. Those jurors had just listened to the defense trying to rip apart the evidence linked to the stabbings of Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ronald Goldman.
S1 "Evidence Over Rhetoric"Prosecutor Christopher Darden tells jurors to decide this case based on evidence and not rhetoric; the jury then listens to lead prosecutor Marcia Clark who returns to the podium for the final remarks in the State's rebuttal.
S1 "Common Sense View Of The Murders"The State brought jurors back to the night of the double murders. Prosecutors tried to refute the Defense's claims of a rush to judgment on the police's part in the early hours of the investigation.
S1 "Summarizing Their Burden of Proof"The prosecution uses two members of the team to deliver the final remarks; the goal is to not only poke holes in the defense's claims, but to focus on the evidence against O.J. that the State believes to have proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
S1 "Devastating Physical Proof"The lead prosecutor tries to simplify things for jurors during the state's rebuttal argument; she claims that the defense needed its police-planting-evidence theory to work because if it doesn't, O.J. Simpson is guilty of double murder.
S1 "The Verdict Heard Around the World"After nearly a year of testimony, the jury finally begins deliberating; soon they will decide the fate of O.J. Simpson; but the jury does have one request - the full testimony of O.J.'s limo driver, Allan Park.
S1 "If It Doesn't Fit, You Must Acquit"Johnnie Cochran, O.J. Simpson's lead attorney, accuses L.A. police of rushing judgment to implicate his client.
S1 "Cross-Corruption"Cross-corruption was the term O.J. Simpson's defense brought up to jurors during closing arguments. The Defense was pushing the idea that corruption had occurred within the LAPD and other entities involved in the murder investigation.
S1 "Bringing Up Mark Fuhrman"Detective Mark Fuhrman's name came up again during the Defense's closing argument. O.J. Simpson's attorneys wanted to remind jurors about what was said on the recorded interviews Fuhrman gave.
S1 "Defense Delivers Their Closing Arguments"The State wraps up its closing argument; it is now the defense's turn to address the jury; O.J. Simpson's lead attorney delivers the defense's closing argument.
S1 "A Cancer In The Murder Investigation"O.J. Simpson's lawyer called the alleged contamination and manufacturing of evidence a cancer in the investigation into what happened to Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.
S1 "Professing O.J. Simpson's Innocence"O.J. Simpson's lead attorney accuses the lead detectives of taking the law into their own hands; Johnnie Cochran also says the investigators are worse than the people who break the law because they are expected to be the protectors of that law.
S1 "Sloppy, Corrupt Police Work"The defense begins its closing argument by condemning the work of the LAPD in this murder investigation; lead defense attorney Johnnie Cochran uses terms like 'speculative', 'cynical', 'dishonest', 'incompetent' and 'corrupt'.
S1 "Putting LAPD on Notice for Jurors"O.J. Simpson's defense uses its closing argument to turn the tables and point a finger at the LAPD; it accuses the police of tampering with and manufacturing crime scene evidence to frame O.J. for the two murders.
S1 "Evidence of Domestic Violence"During closing arguments, prosecutors give the jury some insight into what they think was going on in O.J. Simpson's mind in the hours leading up to the murders of his ex-wife, Nicole, and Ronald Goldman.
S1 "Condemnation Of The LAPD"Johnnie Cochran went after Detective Mark Fuhrman during closing arguments. One of the themes of the defense's case was the condemnation of the LAPD.
S1 "Calling Out The LAPD"Johnnie Cochran claimed if bungling, incompetent police investigators had done their job properly, then O.J. Simpson would have been eliminated early on as a suspect in the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.
S1 "Accidental And Intentional Contamination"O.J. Simpson's defense team accused the state of creating a cancer in the heart of this case. Barry Scheck called the clues in the murder investigation a cesspool of contamination.
S1 "Refuting the State's Murder Timeline"During the Defense's closing arguments, Johnnie Cochran goes through their timeline of events of the night of the murders, which contradict the state's theory on what happened.
S1 "Dismissing the Defense's Case""I'm just the messenger," that's what the prosecutor tells jurors during closing arguments; Christopher Darden is telling the jury what he thinks is on O.J. Simpson's mind.
S1 "O.J. Simpson's Violent Demeanor"The State re-introduces evidence of Nicole Brown Simpson as a domestic abuse victim; it presents photos showing her looking bruised and beaten up; this is all part of the State's attempt to portray O.J. as a domestic-batterer-turned murderer.
Original Air Date: Sep 6, 2023
Genres: DramaTV Series
Rating: TVPG
Playback: HD
1 seasons available on demand (15 episodes)
Frequently asked questions
How can I watch CA v. O.J. Simpson?
How many seasons of CA v. O.J. Simpson are there?
Popular on Fubo