Watch S1, EP59: Issue With Enlarging Video with Fubo for $0 Today
Both sides in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse debate on software programs and methods used in enlarging video content; the state's forensic imagining specialist is recalled back on the stand to clear things up for the jury.
Both sides in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse debate on software programs and methods used in enlarging video content; the state's forensic imagining specialist is recalled back on the stand to clear things up for the jury.
How to watch
More episodes
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP56 "Detailed Video Analysis Delivered to Jurors"Cross-examination begins on the defense's use-of-force expert and certified video analyst; Dr. John Black presents slowed-down video of the deadly shootings, frame by frame, with detailed analysis.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP57 "Social Commentator Chimes In"Social commentator and videographer Frank Hernandez, the defense's witness, testifies that he regularly shows up to civil unrest in other cities throughout the U.S. with the aim of documenting rioters and looters.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP58 "Videographer Bias Towards the Defendant"Social commentator and videographer Frank Hernandez continues on the stand in cross-examination; the prosecution questions Hernandez's bias favoring the defendant Kyle Rittenhouse.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP59 "Issue With Enlarging Video"Both sides in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse debate on software programs and methods used in enlarging video content; the state's forensic imagining specialist is recalled back on the stand to clear things up for the jury.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP55 "Use of Force Expert Breaks Things Down"A use-of-force expert and certified video analyst testifies for the defense; Dr. John Black examines video clips from the events in Kenosha, Wis., and testifies to the timing and actions of Kyle Rittenhouse on that fateful night.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP54 "Certified Video Analyst Testifies"Sitting in a different part of the courtroom, the defense calls their next witness for their case-in-chief; use-of-force expert and certified video analyst Dr. John Black examines the many video and audio clips of that chaotic night in Kenosha, Wis.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP53 "Lengthy Cross Examination"The lengthy cross-examination of the defendant continues in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse; lead prosecutor Thomas Binger walks Rittenhouse back to the fatal moments when he shot and killed Anthony Huber.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP52 "Defendant Testifies to Chaos in Kenosha"During cross-examination, the defendant continues his testimony on the chaos in Kenosha, Wis.; new trial exhibits consisting of video clips are introduced and played back for Kyle Rittenhouse to comment on.
More law shows
See allJudge Judy
This courtroom series stars former family court judge Judy Sheindlin. Each episode finds Judge Judy presiding over real small-claims cases inside a televised courtroom. Her no-nonsense, wisecracking approach has been unsuccessfully copied by other TV court judges.
48 Hours
This newsmagazine investigates intriguing crime and justice cases that touch on all aspects of the human experience. Over its long run, the show has helped exonerate wrongly convicted people, driven the reopening -- and resolution -- of cold cases, and changed numerous lives. CBS News correspondents offer an in-depth look into each story, with the emphasis on solving the mystery at its heart. The program and its team have earned critical acclaim, including multiple Emmy, Peabody and Edward R. Murrow Awards.
Cops
Featuring police officers, constables and sheriff's deputies patrolling streets for car thieves, drug pushers, sex-trade workers, violent thugs and anyone else who dares step onto the wrong side of the law. No music, no scripted dialogue, no narration; just gritty videos of cops in action during patrols and other police activities.
Hot Bench
Many popular court shows are on TV. How can the genre improve? How about using a three-judge panel? That's the concept of "Hot Bench," created by Judge Judy Sheindlin. After hearing each case, the judges discuss it among themselves before rendering a verdict. The show's title comes from a term describing a court action in which a judge frequently interrupts lawyers with questions.