Watch S1, EP30: A Spousal Battery Case with Fubo for $0 Today
Judge Lance Ito allows evidence in of a 1989 domestic violence incident between O.J. and Nicole Simpson; this means prosecutors can try to paint him as a violent husband who they say ended up killing his ex-wife and her friend Ronald Goldman.
Judge Lance Ito allows evidence in of a 1989 domestic violence incident between O.J. and Nicole Simpson; this means prosecutors can try to paint him as a violent husband who they say ended up killing his ex-wife and her friend Ronald Goldman.
How to watch
More episodes
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP29 "The 1989 Incident"The state tries to show O.J. Simpson as an abusive husband years before Nicole and Ronald Goldman are stabbed to death; the officer who responded to a 1989 domestic violence call at O.J. and Nicole Simpson's home has more questions to answer.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP30 "A Spousal Battery Case"Judge Lance Ito allows evidence in of a 1989 domestic violence incident between O.J. and Nicole Simpson; this means prosecutors can try to paint him as a violent husband who they say ended up killing his ex-wife and her friend Ronald Goldman.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP31 "The Abusive Husband"Jurors hear more about a domestic violence case involving O.J. Simpson and Nicole Brown Simpson from 1989; this was the ninth time police showed up to their home in connection with domestic violence allegations, and the first time O.J. was arrested.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP32 "Dreams of Killing Nicole"A close friend of O.J. Simpson testifies for the state over an alleged conversation that took place the day after the double homicide; O.J. allegedly tells Ronald Shipp that he had dreams of killing Nicole.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP28 "Abuse Allegations"Jurors first learn about the abuse accusations against O.J. Simpson from the responding officer to a 911 domestic violence call; Nicole Brown Simpson tells an officer she called police nine times because of domestic violence while married to O.J.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP27 "OJ Simpson the Abuser"The prosecution has a chance to deliver a rebuttal in opening statements to clear up new evidence introduced by the defense; the first witness to testify in the trial is a police officer who responded to an entirely different incident.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP24 "Police Framing OJ"The idea of reasonable doubt is brought up in the defense's opening statement; O.J. Simpson's team tells the jury that the state's version of what led up to the murders, including motive, is a stretch at best and not factual at worst.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP23 "Pointing Fingers at Police"The defense team labels the police who investigated the double homicide of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman as careless, corrupted and negligent, and makes racism allegations against some of the detectives assigned to the case.
