Watch S1, EP1: Opening Statements with Fubo for $0 Today
The defense gives their opening remarks to jurors, claiming that Amy Mullis was found dead on the family's hog farm; Todd and his oldest son found her face down with a corn rake sticking out of her back.
The defense gives their opening remarks to jurors, claiming that Amy Mullis was found dead on the family's hog farm; Todd and his oldest son found her face down with a corn rake sticking out of her back.
How to watch
More episodes
Corn Rake Murder Trial
S1, EP1 "Opening Statements"The defense gives their opening remarks to jurors, claiming that Amy Mullis was found dead on the family's hog farm; Todd and his oldest son found her face down with a corn rake sticking out of her back.
Corn Rake Murder Trial
S1, EP2 "Hearing From Family Members"Amy Mullis' brother tells the jurors that she was unhappy in her marriage and had plans to divorce Todd and move out; the oldest son of Todd and Amy Mullis testifies; Trysten was the one who found Amy unresponsive in a shed on the family's farm.
More law shows
See allJudge Judy
This courtroom series stars former family court judge Judy Sheindlin. Each episode finds Judge Judy presiding over real small-claims cases inside a televised courtroom. Her no-nonsense, wisecracking approach has been unsuccessfully copied by other TV court judges.
The People's Court
A judge hears small-claims cases in this series that served as a template for several similar courtroom series. The litigants in the case agree to drop their lawsuits and have the case heard on the show. Since the show is not a real courtroom, the decision is simply binding arbitration the litigants agree to abide by.
Judy Justice
Judge Judy Sheindlin returns to the courtroom.
Hot Bench
Many popular court shows are on TV. How can the genre improve? How about using a three-judge panel? That's the concept of "Hot Bench," created by Judge Judy Sheindlin. After hearing each case, the judges discuss it among themselves before rendering a verdict. The show's title comes from a term describing a court action in which a judge frequently interrupts lawyers with questions.