
Many popular court shows are on TV. How can the genre improve? How about using a three-judge panel? That's the concept of "Hot Bench," created by Judge Judy Sheindlin. After hearing each case, the judges discuss it among themselves before rendering a verdict. The show's title comes from a term describing a court action in which a judge frequently interrupts lawyers with questions.

A friendship unravels in court over a sudden eviction, missing valuables and a towed car: the plaintiff accuses a roommate of threats and theft, while the defendant argues that she was wronged and left everything behind.

A woman says an SUV swerved into her lane; the other driver argues that the woman was speeding and is exaggerating the damage.

A left-turn collision sparks a heated courtroom clash when a man says another driver refused a fair-damage split; she insists he hit her car and is simply trying to profit, so she countersues for damages!

A homeowner says her contractor vanished after taking advance payment for custom doors; the contractor blames backorders, hospital stays and her constant design changes for the delays; when flaky fixes and flimsy fibs jam the frame, the judges pry open the truth.