Watch S1, EP24: Police Framing OJ with Fubo for $0 Today
The idea of reasonable doubt is brought up in the defense's opening statement; O.J. Simpson's team tells the jury that the state's version of what led up to the murders, including motive, is a stretch at best and not factual at worst.
The idea of reasonable doubt is brought up in the defense's opening statement; O.J. Simpson's team tells the jury that the state's version of what led up to the murders, including motive, is a stretch at best and not factual at worst.
How to watch
More episodes
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP14 "A Cesspool of Contamination"O.J. Simpson's defense accuses the Los Angeles Police Department of fraudulent police work and numerous violations by investigators, and calls the LAPD crime lab a cesspool of contamination.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP22 "Issues of Credibility"O.J. Simpson's lead defense attorney turns the jury's attention to issues of credibility during opening statements, accusing the police of dropping the ball in how they processed the crime scene and examined key evidence in the crime lab.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP23 "Pointing Fingers at Police"The defense team labels the police who investigated the double homicide of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman as careless, corrupted and negligent, and makes racism allegations against some of the detectives assigned to the case.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP24 "Police Framing OJ"The idea of reasonable doubt is brought up in the defense's opening statement; O.J. Simpson's team tells the jury that the state's version of what led up to the murders, including motive, is a stretch at best and not factual at worst.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP13 "Bad Police Work"The defense claims the police did not immediately call the coroner's office after the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman are discovered; instead, they were called 10 hours after investigators showed up, a violation of police procedure.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP12 "Two Different OJ Simpsons"The defense paints a different picture of O.J. Simpson than what the state tells jurors; prosecutors say he was abusive, and his rage led to the murders; the defense claims that he was a benevolent man who helped his wife, her family and friends.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP11 "Defense Gives Their Opening Statements"Lead attorney Johnnie Cochran begins, with the focus on why O.J. Simpson was not responsible for the stabbing deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman.
CA v. O.J. Simpson
S1, EP10 "All About the Blood"The state argues that the evidence left behind proves O.J. Simpson's guilt in the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, and says that bloody footprints leave an important trail.
