
Watch S26, EP74: Cheating Mama's Boy: Brooklyn Johnson v Mario Stephens with Fubo for $0 Today
Brooklyn says she feels like a single mom in her relationship; she says Mario refuses to watch their 2-year-old son; Mario says because of his son's age, he feels Brooklyn's mother is better equipped to watch their son during the day.
Brooklyn says she feels like a single mom in her relationship; she says Mario refuses to watch their 2-year-old son; Mario says because of his son's age, he feels Brooklyn's mother is better equipped to watch their son during the day.
How to watch
More episodes
Divorce Court
S26, EP178 "No More Sex With Your Ex!: Fidelia McCord vs. Jonathan Norwood"Fidelia says her fiancé is a cheater; even her family says to leave this toxic relationship; she's postponed the wedding, and the polygraph test results will determine if she stays or leaves.
Divorce Court
S26, EP175 "Split House Saga: Ciara Gunn vs. Richard Gunn"One night, Richard came home at 3:00 a.m. and refused to tell Ciara where he had been; she believes he was with another woman.
Divorce Court
S26, EP73 "I Cheated: Jennifer Everett v Michael Southard"Jennifer says she believes her husband could be falling out of love with her; she says their sex life is non-existent, and he doesn't care to celebrate their anniversary or her birthday; Michael says there is a reason for his behavior.
Divorce Court
S26, EP72 "It's Grilling Season: Chrystal Cherry v Nathan Cherry"Chrystal says she is frustrated with her husband sabotaging their business by not putting in enough effort, and she feels the same about their marriage. Nathan says he is fully invested in his marriage.
Divorce Court
S26, EP177 "Money Doesn't Grow on Trees: Steve Mylius vs. Leta Mylius"Steve says Leta sits around all day, and her insecurities get the best of her; he is 13 years younger, and she is constantly accusing him of sleeping with younger women; He's willing to take a polygraph test to prove his innocence.
Divorce Court
S26, EP176 "Splitting Acres & Splitting Hearts: Kelly Wilson vs. Jennifer Wilson"Kelly says his wife's childish behavior and temper tantrums have pushed him to the limit: he's fed up and wants a divorce.
Divorce Court
S26, EP174 "The Knot With a Lying, Cheating Fiancé?: Keaundre Lane vs. Lisa Elston"Keaundre took his son on a playdate; when he returned home, he found Lisa sitting on the couch in lingerie with a condom wrapper on the floor; he believes she cheated with the maintenance man, who was there when he left.
Divorce Court
S26, EP173 "Lost Love, Last Bet: Francesca Crowe vs. Ahmed Griggs"Francesca is in court to end her engagement; she says her fiancé is a disrespectful cheater with a gambling problem.
More law shows
See allJudge Judy
This courtroom series stars former family court judge Judy Sheindlin. Each episode finds Judge Judy presiding over real small-claims cases inside a televised courtroom. Her no-nonsense, wisecracking approach has been unsuccessfully copied by other TV court judges.
48 Hours
This newsmagazine investigates intriguing crime and justice cases that touch on all aspects of the human experience. Over its long run, the show has helped exonerate wrongly convicted people, driven the reopening -- and resolution -- of cold cases, and changed numerous lives. CBS News correspondents offer an in-depth look into each story, with the emphasis on solving the mystery at its heart. The program and its team have earned critical acclaim, including multiple Emmy, Peabody and Edward R. Murrow Awards.
Cops
Featuring police officers, constables and sheriff's deputies patrolling streets for car thieves, drug pushers, sex-trade workers, violent thugs and anyone else who dares step onto the wrong side of the law. No music, no scripted dialogue, no narration; just gritty videos of cops in action during patrols and other police activities.
Hot Bench
Many popular court shows are on TV. How can the genre improve? How about using a three-judge panel? That's the concept of "Hot Bench," created by Judge Judy Sheindlin. After hearing each case, the judges discuss it among themselves before rendering a verdict. The show's title comes from a term describing a court action in which a judge frequently interrupts lawyers with questions.