Watch S1, EP63: Drone Footage with Fubo for $0 Today
The prosecution shows drone footage to the court in its argument over provocation instructions to the jury; the judge listenes to arguments about what the jury will be allowed to consider when they get the case in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial.
The prosecution shows drone footage to the court in its argument over provocation instructions to the jury; the judge listenes to arguments about what the jury will be allowed to consider when they get the case in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial.
How to watch
More episodes
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP61 "Reckless Homicide or Self-Defense?"Rittenhouse claims he acted in self-defense when he shot three people during a protest in Kenosha, Wis., in 2020; the judge, defense and prosecution continue to argue over the charge of reckless homicide and what the jury will be allowed to consider.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP62 "The Reckless Murder Charge"Both sides in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse go back and forth over the issue of what provoked the shootings that left two men dead and one injured; Rittenhouse says this was self-defense, but the prosecution argues he was reckless.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP63 "Drone Footage"The prosecution shows drone footage to the court in its argument over provocation instructions to the jury; the judge listenes to arguments about what the jury will be allowed to consider when they get the case in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP64 "Judge Makes the Call"Judge Bruce Schroeder works on the final instructions for jurors as they prepare to decide Rittenhouse's fate over the shooting of three men; a red flag is raised about the images from the night of the shooting used as evidence.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP60 "Defense Challenges State's Expert Witness"State's witness James Armstrong, a forensic imagining specialist, clears things up on his work in the case; the defense challenges Armstrong's work, claiming it cannot be trusted to accurately show Kyle Rittenhouse's actions on that fateful night.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP59 "Issue With Enlarging Video"Both sides in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse debate on software programs and methods used in enlarging video content; the state's forensic imagining specialist is recalled back on the stand to clear things up for the jury.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP58 "Videographer Bias Towards the Defendant"Social commentator and videographer Frank Hernandez continues on the stand in cross-examination; the prosecution questions Hernandez's bias favoring the defendant Kyle Rittenhouse.
WI v. Rittenhouse
S1, EP57 "Social Commentator Chimes In"Social commentator and videographer Frank Hernandez, the defense's witness, testifies that he regularly shows up to civil unrest in other cities throughout the U.S. with the aim of documenting rioters and looters.
